| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
So our endless winter has decided to dump more than a foot of snow on the area. By midweek, temperatures will rise and there will be widespread flooding. I'm surprised that the cities haven't thought of an enterprise that involves vacuuming up the snow off the streets and shipping it (melted) by rail to Los Angeles. They can have it...
Duuuude!
(The bird's name is Snowball and here's his story. Apparently self-taught, including the little headbang at the end.)
Although if YouTube is any indication, this is hardly unique behavior. Apparently cockatoos dig pop music.
The Trap, yet another Adam Curtis documentary, examines game theory, anthropology, evolutionary psychology and the notion of perceived freedom. Can human beings, as social creatures, ever truly attain individual freedom? As one system of control and heirarchy is phased out, another steps in to take its place. Part 1 Part 2 Part 3a 3b 3c
This film explains that "survival of the fittest" does not necessarily mean "...of the strongest", but of the perpetuation of the most successful reproductive strategies.
...from a modern-day storyteller
Most of us are familiar with the whimsical children's stories of Dr. Seuss, but before he embarked on his career as a famous children's author, he had been a political cartoonist as well as a writer for "Private Snafu", a series of Warner Brothers cartoons created for the U.S. Army. Given Seuss' background in politics, it's really no surprise that many of his stories also play out as sociopolitical commentary.
Seuss was ahead of his time -- in this story, identifying memetic trends and clique behavior before the term was even coined. Note how he's distinguishing bird-brained mentality vs. the more clever manipulator, portrayed as a primate.
(I didn't produce this video, by the way. It was either this or the longer song-and-dance animated production that was posted on YouTube).
Mental JPEGS and the Evolution of the False Dichotomy
Al Sharpton was in the news yet again, this time for his defense of the stripper who accused several Duke University lacrosse players of rape.
Why were the Duke lacrosse players so widely presumed guilty before being proven innocent? Is it because many automatically equate "white, male" with "oppressor" and "black, female" with "oppressed"? Is it because "lynch mob mentality" really knows no color?
So many others are commenting on this case that yet another entry in the blogosphere would be redundant. So let's move on to a more thematic topic.
For any reader who assumes these past two entries have been about defending white guys while criticizing blacks, or have been making any presumptions about my race, sex, place in the political spectrum, etc. then you probably haven't been thinking outside your personal Crayola box.
In the book "Blink", Malcolm Gladwell discusses how the human mind has been programmed to make "snap judgments"; which are often based on earlier learning experiences. Our minds grasp a learned concept; it is compressed into a kind of shorthand form of information and then stored in memory for quick reference. I'll refer to these here as "mental jpegs". As with jpegs, complexity, nuance and details often get lost, and in addition are usually contaminated with personal bias of some sort. This is the brain's way of economizing energy, which really came in handy back in the days when snap judgments were more of a matter of life or death.
Mental jpegs are roughly defined as a subset of ideas, assumptions, traits or characteristics. Conversely, a partial or incomplete set of ideas or characteristics can elicit a mental jpeg label with the assumption that all other ideas, characteristics, etc. are associated with them. (For instance, assuming that someone who discusses evolution also votes Democratic.)
One of the shortest shorthand forms of thinking is "us vs. them". Either something is "on our side", or it's "against us". Judging from the universal popularity of sports, video games and other forms of competitive behavior, we are seemingly programmed to react in such a manner so we can enjoy combat or sparring of some sort. Or perhaps, too, this is rooted in our social/tribal makeup, based on an instinctual need for group solidarity. ...In fact, neuroscientists more recently performed a study that demonstrated that partisan thought is rooted in the unconscious. Note this particularly glaring example of "affiliation over idea".
The power of this kind of reflexive mental jpeg has been demonstrated time and time again throughout the course of human history. It appears to be an innate part of our nature and nobody seems to be immune to it no matter what political party, nationality, race, sex, educational background or affiliation. It appears to arouse a certain irrational combative mode of behavior and often gets in the way of problem-solving.
If we really need to harbor any particular dichotomies, perhaps they should be: "is this thinking, or is this reacting?"
Imus Not Be Getting It...
OK, so this rancid old shock jock gets canned over some racist and sexist remarks, apparently thinking he was funny by paraphrasing hiphop-style lyrics. ...And yeah, what he said was pretty stupid and offensive; I won't argue with that.
The knees of the liberal mediocrats have been jerking rather predictably. Let's string up this Bad White Boy and oh, what a shame people can't learn to be a bit more sensitive!
Reading today's newspaper columns and commentary, I did notice a repeated and glaring omission. The fact is, degrading racist and sexist comments far worse than Imus' gaffe (and have had an arguably negative impact on the Black community) have been being broadcast for years all over the airwaves courtesy artists who aren't Caucasian. Where's the outcry from Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton over those remarks?
Is this really something a guy should lose his job over? (Not that he'd be destitute with what he's making, but still.) Why couldn't the offended parties taken a more fair-and-equal approach by simply exercising their own freedom of speech? They could have just called him a "dried up old dead-cat head" or something like that. (Which is kind of on the immature side, but hey, sometimes people can only learn if they get a taste of their own medicine).
Some may try to differentiate between Imus' remark and rappers by pointing out that Imus made a personal attack on a specific group of individuals, whereas rappers aren't directing their remarks at anyone in particular. On the other hand, consider how influential hiphop culture has been to an entire generation with regard to their attitudes about race and sex, and how those attitudes may have had an effect on black women as individuals. One possible silver lining in this is that it might open up debate with regard to issues like double standards and accountability. If Imus was only trying to paraphrase the kind of remarks common to the hiphop community, then why is it OK for the hiphop community to say those kinds of things in the first place?
Does it all really have to do with context?
